It looks like Obama is marching in zombie lockstep with Bush policy in Somalia and Honduras. It also looks like a Great Leap Backward to the days of US suported military coups in Latin America, and despots propped up by US aid in Africa. In both cases the United States provides the military training and the weapons.
… General Vasquez attended the School of the Americas and … a good part of the Honduran military were trained there and in its successor, the Western Hemisphere Institute for Security Cooperation (WHINSEC).…… the U.S. has a military base in Honduras, gives the Honduran military a few million dollars each year, and … most of the military equipment used against the people was from the U.S.…… a group that openly supported the coup, “Paz and Democracia” (Peace and Democracy), received money from the USAID. (Eva Golinger reported that the USAID pumps more than 50 million dollars into the country each year.)…… the immediate response from Washington was tepid and non-committal. … Dan Restrepo, the presidential advisor for Latin American affairs, said the administration was waiting to see how things would play out. (The response has been stronger since then, but still seems to lack the strength other America nations have put forward in their demands.)
Yes, I know Fox News is not the best way to judge the political scene in the US, but this video clip is a hint into the way US media is now beginning to portray the coup events in Honduras over the past few days. And note the NPR correspondent’s comments, very similar analysis as to mine over the past few days regarding Washington’s ambiguity regarding this coup so as to buy time and possibly recognize the coup government as “transitory” until the elections in November…….very dangerous.Note, this will isolate the US/Obama Administration from the rest of Latin America and definitely show Obama is not an agent of change.
Reuters: Al Shabaab and allied fighters control much of southern and central Somalia and have boxed the government and 4,300 African Union peackeepers into a few blocks of Mogadishu.
US violations are said to include a missile attack on a target inside Somalia along with “intensive and comprehensive military training” conducted inside Ethiopia for officers from the breakaway Somalia region known as Somaliland.
Daniel Volman writes on security policy in Somalia:
The only other indication we have about the president’s true intentions is provided by his decision to authorise the use of force to rescue the kidnapped captain of the Maersk Alabama in May 2009. When he was a candidate, President Obama declared that he believed that ‘there will be situations that require the United States to work with its partners in Africa to fight terrorism with lethal force.’ But his action during the kidnapping episode show that he is also willing to use military force in situations that have nothing to do with terrorism. According to recent news articles, a debate is currently underway within the administration about the wisdom of direct US military intervention against Somali pirates or against the al-Shabaab insurgents. Top administration officials and military officers are convinced that, in the words of Defense Secretary Robert Gates, ‘there is no purely military solution’ to piracy and political conflict in Somalia. And Johnnie Carson, the president’s new assistant secretary of state for Africa, told the BBC that ‘there would be no case of the US re-engaging on the ground with troops’ in Somalia. But some in the military and a number of prominent neo-conservative leaders contend that the United States must strike back at the pirates and the insurgents to prevent future acts of piracy and terrorism against Americans. It would be a mistake to assume that Obama will not take further military action if the situation in Somalia escalates.
If you read this transcript of the June 25 State Department daily press briefing, it sounds like the US government really does not know what it is doing in Somalia. And so far it looks like more US interference just recruits more Somali insurgents. US violence and interference will never resolve Somali problems. The US is interested in possible oil in Somalia. The EU continues to steal fish from Somali waters, and dump toxic and nuclear waste in those same waters. Keeping things unsettled in Somalia works to the advantage of all these outside meddlers.
As b real puts it:
the TFG2 has always been a weak actor in the mix. as i’ve elaborated on in multiple threads, there is more evidence that, rather than create a strong federal govt, the int’l community’s overriding objective has been to pit islamist factions against each other in order to engage them into battle amongst themselves rather than be united and [1] establish an independent govt and [2], so goes the reasoning of the unrestrained paranoid fantasies of the int’l actors, threaten & carry out ‘terrorist’ activities beyond the borders of somalia. letting them wage a war of attrition between themselves requires a minimal amount of overhead & a modicum of commitment.
their lip service to sh. sharif’s govt can be seen as an inside joke, directing, instead, the bulk of support to AMISOM and putting pressure on the UN to get more countries paying for the militarization of east africa. meanwhile, the main beneficiaries are int’l arms dealers, int’l NGOs, and, eventually, the wildcatters up through the big oil companies still comfortably playing the force majeure card.
In the long run it does not pay to be an international bully. It comes back to bite you. And the US cannot afford to garrison the entire world. It cannot afford the wars it is already waging. The proxy armies it is creating with the US Africa Command will go into business for themselves. President Obama has a lot on his plate at home. It may seem easier to let the policies that were already in place continue to run their course. In general Obama seems reluctant to get out front and lead on specific issues. If the US is going to retain its own democracy, and carry any moral weight in the world, President Obama will have to step forward and lead in the democratic direction. There is no hope and change without democratic leadership.
________
Note: the illustration above is from BibliOdyssey.
July 17, 2009 at 5:21 pm
africa action’s gerald lemelle on this week’s counterspin, speaking largely on africom
Gerald Lemelle on Obama in Africa
it’s a short interview, follow the link for the downloadable mp3
July 17, 2009 at 9:40 pm
Thanks for the fair.org link. LeMelle is really good at short clear explanations. I think there are a lot of people in Ghana who love Obama, but are not missing the point. For example Yaw Opare-Asamoa wrote
And this gave me a laugh:
arabist.net linked and recommended your original articles.
There were a couple of other nice bits of skepticism I saw, but of course US media is a complete stranger. One blogger pointed out the Africans have been saying the same things Obama said for years, but I can’t locate the link right now.
July 28, 2009 at 1:00 am
gowans has a really good writeup on obama’s speech in ghana making many of the points i would have if i had the time to sit down & organize my thoughts
Obama’s Africa Speech: Lies, Hypocrisy, and a Prescription for Continued African Dependence
July 28, 2009 at 1:56 pm
the east african: US names ‘military’ envoys to Kampala, Dar
July 28, 2009 at 5:32 pm
b real, Extra thanks for these tips. I was writing something on this topic and had not seen either article. I need to include both of them. I must say I am one who finds very little comfort in Mr. Lanier’s comments, or in the direction of many of the Obama appointments. I saw a very brief professional bio of Lanier, and he looks cast somewhat from the Ranneberger mold, a cia guy. (Back around 1979 I visited a friend in Jamaica briefly. I remember seeing grafitti referring to Edward Seaga as CIAguy. The sound of the name stuck in my mind. I think of Ranneberger as ciaguy.)
Gowans is really on target. I particularly appreciated what he said about Zimbabwe, a very neat summary. The press on Mugabe has made him wildly unpopular around the world, and he has certainly done his share of thuggery. I used to admire him some time back, and have felt saddened at the turn of events there. I have read Mamdani some on Zimbabwe. South Africa is also sitting on a land reform powder keg, but I think it is not yet ready to blow. I do wonder about Zuma, how he will navigate the land issue and the Africa Command issue.
July 29, 2009 at 3:04 pm
minter & volman on kpfa’s program against the grain. mp3 download available at link.
Somalia and AFRICOM