
Child soldiers from the Mai-Mai militia guard the headquarters of their leader in Kisharu, Democratic Republic of Congo. Photograph: Nicolas Postal/EPA
In the Eastern DRC Laurent Nkunda, mentioned in the previous post, Part 1 of DRC- Minerals, militaries, money and violence, is the leader of the Tutsi militia. There are also Hutu militias, one of the largest of which is the Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda (FDLR). The Guardian has a couple of image galleries of the people displaced by the violence in the eastern DRC, here and here. All of these militias conscript and indoctrinate child soldiers. From Chris McGreal in the Guardian:
… the extremist Hutu rebels who control large areas of eastern Congo and are among the most important causes of the conflict there that has claimed an estimated five million lives or more over the past decade and continues to kill about 45,000 people each month in Congo through the effects of war – principally starvation and disease.
…
While the rank and file of the FDLR survives by plundering, their leaders are involved in altogether more lucrative ventures. A 2007 World Bank-funded study estimates that the FDLR leadership makes millions of dollars a year from taking over mines in parts of North Kivu, such as Masisi and Walikale, or from those doing the hard labour through levying “taxes” of gold, coltan, diamonds and other minerals on mine owners.The study estimates that the FDLR controls half of the mineral trade in the Kivus outside of the main towns, and oversees the smuggling of gold and diamonds for sale in neighbouring countries such as Uganda and Burundi. It is not alone in this. The Rwandan, Ugandan and Burundi armies, as well as warlords and militias, have also carved up the mineral plunder and smuggling rackets.
You can read the entire account of the FDLR with pictures here at the Guardian.
Also as mentioned in the previous post, the World Bank and the IMF have praised both Rwanda and Uganda for increasing their gross domestic product from illegal mining of DRC resources. Both the World Bank and the IMF know neither Rwanda or Uganda has these mineral resources in their own countries. Such praise, and the accompanying financial incentives exacerbate the violence and exploitation.
The violence that erupted last week may be cooling down. Alan Doss, who represents the UN in the DRC, the Democratic Republic of the Congo:
says calm has returned to Rutshuru in the country’s volatile North Kivu province following last week’s clashes between Government forces and armed rebel groups. … The clashes that broke out on 28 August between the Congolese Armed Forces (FARDC) and the National Congress for People’s Defense, known by its French acronym CNDP, was some of the worst fighting since a peace deal was signed by the parties in January.
But there is a new player in town. The Chinese have come into the DRC in a big way with contracts to extract copper and cobalt, and in return build roads, railroads, clinics, schools, and two universities. This 20 minute video from the BBC describes the huge copper and cobalt mine they plan to exploit, and the network of roads, rail, schools and clinics the Chinese have promised to build in return. So far the Chinese seem to be very image conscious. However, this 12 minute BBC video from Zambia describes the Zambian public as highly disillusioned with the Chinese presence, particularly labor practices and safety issues, and Zambians say the Chinese management purposely ran the large clothing factory into the ground so it would not be competitive with subsidized textiles from China. China is doing the same thing the EU and US have been doing, destroy African markets by dumping subsidized goods. And the Zambians say promised schools and training never materialized.
Below is the map from the BBC video on China in the DRC with all the infrastructure promised in the Chinese contract for copper and cobalt in the DRC. The large icons are the promised universities. The second map is the same, but just shows the roads and rail promised.
In the map the roads run north and south, along the eastern side of the DRC. The rail line runs from east to west.
IF China actually builds the roads, rail, and actually builds schools and the two univeristies called for in the contract with the DRC, that would be quite remarkable and provide a long overdue genuine step to positive development. It would also provide a positive challenge to the west. Mostly the west, when it noticed at all, has bemoaned the fact that people are killing and raping in the DRC, but ignored the ongoing western role in subsidizing and encouraging this violence.
And how will the west react to this Chinese presence? As you can see, the road network is north and south, up and down the mineral rich eastern DRC, and the rail, west to southeast, can take minerals to the coast. Will the US and other foreign business and governments who are profiting from the current situation in the DRC allow the Chinese to build this infrastructure without interference?


September 7, 2008 at 1:41 am
i reckon that the u.s. is already on the ball to compete w/ china, working “to ensure that goods from the interior of africa make it to the ports and onto the world
market” via the “sub-saharan africa trade corridor transportation initiative” & the east african central corridor. i speculated back in may at MoA that keeping up w/ china in the drc was probably part of the reason behind it , citing a fed planning doc that investigative reporter the peacock report noticed.
of course, developing infrastructure to move goods out of africa is nothing new. and the chaos generated around the kenyan coup that affected fuel & other imports to customers in the interior helped to make dar es salaam a more important port, but, and esp if it’s u.s. funding that’s footing the bill on much of this development, the reality is that it is what comes out that is much more significant that what goes in.
and, as you cover, both rwanda & uganda have been pillaging the congo for years now.
here’s a relevant exchange on that (and your posts) from an interview w/ paul rusesabagina by keith harmon snow
—-
still working through your links – thanks for the post!
September 7, 2008 at 8:04 pm
The scramble continues. I had read about the huge embassey complex somewhere, I think when Bush was visiting, but had forgotten. And I’m sure you are right about the corridor. I did think it was pretty funny about the report “to USAID on whether U.S. taxpayers should bear the brunt of more significant “investments” into that region.” I bet they didn’t have too much difficulty reaching a conclusion, though the taxpayers remain in ignorance.
It does look like Rwanda is being groomed for AFRICOM.
I really appreciate the interview as well. I hadn’t seen that. I guess I hadn’t realized how obvious it all is.
If you have any observations on the Zambia video I’d be interested. I wasn’t too surprised at the reasons for disappointment in Zambia. It sounds like what I’ve read of Chinese practices within China and around the world.
September 9, 2008 at 11:58 pm
i’m still not able to get the bbc vid to play in either firefox or ie on my machines here – not sure what is going on. will have to see if i can’t view it on someone else’s box. i’ll take a guess though that it’s similar to others western media stories on china in africa (e.g., China’s Conquest of Africa or, from that series of biased articles last year co-authored by howard french, China’s Trade in Africa Carries a Price Tag).
anecdotally, i don’t have much other than the opinions of families & friends to go on, which generally tend to be critical of any foreign interests moving in — whether they be from china, india or nigeria. alot of the same stories i hear from my friends elsewhere — shoddy roads, poor construction materials, use of imported chinese labor & materials, undercutting local vendors, etc etc. but i also hear good things about the chinese in zambia too — more honest than the us/uk, they don’t just say they’re going to do something, they deliver right away, they’re willing to pay good money, of which they have alot of, and china doesn’t have the historical baggage of being a colonizer & thus that particular condescending mentality, at least in the traditional sense.
i should search around to see if there have been any polls conducted on zambian attitudes toward chinese invstmt/development there. i know that former presidents had good relations & things to say, of course.
in the last presidential elections, opposition candidate michael sata got a lot of mileage out of whipping the public up into animosity of the chinese — typical political scapegoat tactics to manipulate voters — even going so far as to declare that, if elected, zambia would recognize taiwan just to piss off china, however now he has done a complete about-face & is encouraging more chinese invstmt in zambia (he wants to win the presidency in october).
i also need to search for reports/studies citing numbers on what china has actually put into zambia, rather than relying on (most) news stories, institutions which have a vested interest in preserving western rule & influence.
here’s something from one article i read today
September 10, 2008 at 4:20 pm
I’ll try pasting the straight URL in for the videos. I went to one of them by one route and it wouldn’t play, and by another route and it did. I checked the links and they both work at home, Firefox, and work, IE.
China in DR Congo aid deal
Tuesday, 15 April 2008
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/7347686.stm
China’s Zambia role sours
Friday, 18 April 2008
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programmes/newsnight/7355369.stm
Both reports are by Tim Whewell. Maybe if the links don’t work, a search will. Both pretty much follow the usual western media lines, but they have a bit more detail than some.
I got a chuckle out of which generally tend to be critical of any foreign interests moving in. That seems to be pretty universal.
October 25, 2008 at 1:28 am
a brief in the indian ocean newsletter dated october 25, 2008 reports Kampala still rocking the boat: A number of different clues lead to renewed suspicion that Uganda is discreetly backing rebels in the Eastern Democratic Republic of the Congo
basically, it says that the united nations organization mission in the democratic republic of the congo (MONUC) is pretty sure that uganda’s UPDF is arming the rebel front, the front pour la justice au congo (FPJC), which has been waging attacks against the DRC army
it lists several clues, but i found the sentence at the end of the article to be the most damning: